the health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: a systematic review of the current evidence

نویسندگان

mohammadreza mobinizadeh department of health services management, science and research branch, islamic azad university, tehran, iran.

pouran raeissi department of health services management, school of management and medical information science, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

amir ashkan nasiripour department of health services management, science and research branch, islamic azad university, tehran, iran.

alireza olyaeemanesh national institute for health research, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran.

چکیده

background: in the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. the proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. on the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entry of these technologies may result in induced demand by service providers. the aim of this study was to determine the appropriate criteria used in health technologies priority-setting models in the world.   methods: using mesh and free text, we sought and retrieved the relevant articles from the most appropriate medical databases (the cochrane library, pubmed and scopus) through three separate search strategies up to march 2015. the inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies with specific criteria; 2) articles written in english; 3) those articles conducted in compliance with priority setting of health technologies. data were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic synthesis technique.   results: after screening the retrieved papers via prisma framework, from the 7,012 papers, 40 studies were included in the final phase. criteria for selecting health technologies (in pre assessment and in the assessment phase) were categorized into six main themes:  1) health outcomes; 2) disease and target population; 3) technology alternatives; 4) economic aspects; 5) evidence; 6) and other factors. “health effects/benefits” had the maximum frequency in health outcomes (8 studies); “disease severity” had the maximum frequency in disease and target population (12 studies); “the number of alternatives” had the maximum frequency in alternatives (2 studies); “cost-effectiveness” had the maximum frequency in economic aspects (15 studies); “quality of evidence” had the maximum frequency in evidence (4 studies); and “issues concerning the health system” had the maximum frequency in other factors (10 studies).   conclusion: the results revealed an increase in the number of studies on health technologies priority setting around the world, and emphasized the necessity of application of a multi- criteria approach for appropriate decision making about healthcare technologies in the health systems.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The health systems\' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence

Background: In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. On the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entry of these technologies may result in induced demand by service providers. The aim of this study ...

متن کامل

The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may considerably help in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. On the other hand, unlimited and unrestricted entry of these technologies may result in induced demand by service providers. The aim of this study w...

متن کامل

‘Real-world’ health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND Health care decision making requires making resource allocation decisions among programs, services, and technologies that all compete for a finite resource pool. Methods of priority setting that use explicitly defined criteria can aid health care decision makers in arriving at funding decisions in a transparent and systematic way. The purpose of this paper is to review the published ...

متن کامل

Health technology assessment of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): A systematic review of current evidence

Background: Image-guided radiotherapy used multiple imaging during the radiation therapy course to improve the precision and accuracy of health care provider's treatment. Objectives: This study aims to assess the safety, effectiveness and economic aspects of image-guided radiation therapy for decision-making about this technology in Iran. Methods: In this study, the most important med...

متن کامل

evidence of adverse selection in irans health insurance market

در این تحقیق به مطالعه وجود انتخاب نامساعد(کژ گزینی) در بازار بیمه درمان تکمیلی ایران پرداخته شده است. داده های مورد نیاز توسط پرسشنامه و به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای جمع آوری شده است. پرسشنامه ها در میان افراد شاغل ساکن شهر تهران توریع شد. در این تحقیق با استفاده از تخمین دو مدل لجستیک و به دست آوردن ضریب همبستگی میان تقاضای بیمه درمان تکمیلی و رخداد خسارت به بررسی موضوع مورد نظر پرداخته شده است....

15 صفحه اول

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
medical journal of islamic republic of iran

جلد ۳۰، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۴۶-۱۶۲

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023